How Call Monitoring Software Is Replacing the Shadow Shift

Many insurance brokerages train new starters by pairing them with a senior broker for a shift or two of shadowing, then trusting that the calls the new starter happened to sit in on were the right ones to learn from. This article looks at what that shadow shift model costs in senior broker time, what it misses once a new starter is taking calls alone, and how call monitoring software gives new starters feedback on their own calls instead of a manager's interpretation of a handful of others. It also looks at how monitoring calls systematically, rather than sampling them during onboarding, can support a brokerage's supervision and record-keeping practices, and what a brokerage moving away from the shadow shift can put in its place.
Why This Matters Right Now
The shadow shift refers to a way some brokerages bring a new starter up to speed. In one version of this model, a senior broker takes the new hire onto calls for a few days, narrates what is happening, and hands over live calls once the new starter looks ready. It is a reasonable starting point, and it can work well for a brokerage bringing on the occasional new hire. It also carries a cost that rarely appears on a training budget: the senior broker's own selling and servicing time.
Onboarding research from FirstHR reports manager time spent on direct training and supervision at more than 10 hours per new hire, on top of whatever time colleagues spend answering questions along the way. For a brokerage bringing on two or three new starters a quarter, that is a meaningful block of time diverted from other duties, potentially including the client-facing work that generates revenue and keeps renewal conversations on schedule. The shadow shift does not show up as a line item, but it is not free.
The bigger constraint is not the hours themselves. It is what those hours can realistically cover. If a shadow period runs two or three days, a senior broker sits in on only a small slice of the calls the brokerage handles that week. Everything the new starter needs to learn about handling an anxious client, a complex claim, or an awkward premium conversation has to come from whatever calls happened to occur during that window.
of contact centres monitor fewer than four calls per agent each month (Call Centre Helper, general contact-centre benchmark, not insurance-broking specific)
FirstHR's reported estimate of manager time invested in training and supervising each new hire
average time for a new hire to reach full productivity across roles (FirstHR onboarding research)
Shadow shifts show a new starter a handful of calls. Their own calls show them everything.
Callyx.ai turns every recorded call into a training resource a new starter can learn from, not just the ones a senior broker happened to be part of.
The Core Problem
A shadow shift gives a new starter a sample of calls chosen by circumstance, not by what the new starter actually needs to learn. Which calls a senior broker takes during a two or three day shadow period depends on who rings in that week, not on which conversations would teach the most. A new starter might spend a full day listening to straightforward renewal calls and never hear a senior broker manage a complaint, a lapsed policy, or a client pushing back on cover. Gaps in what a new starter has been exposed to often only surface once they are handling calls alone.
A similar limitation shows up across the wider contact-centre industry whenever call review depends on a person selecting a sample rather than covering everything. Long-running benchmarking from Call Centre Helper has found that a substantial share of contact centres monitor fewer than four calls per agent each month, well short of anything close to full coverage. That figure describes contact centres generally rather than insurance broking specifically, but a similar pattern can apply to a shadow shift: where no separate ongoing review process is in place, a new starter can end up with their calls checked only against whatever the senior broker heard during onboarding, then operating largely on their own from that point forward. Once the shadow shift ends, the calls a new starter takes in the following months can go largely unreviewed unless a separate process is put in place.
This is not a gap in effort. Brokerages that run shadow shifts are giving new starters real, hands-on exposure to how the business actually talks to clients, which is more than many training programmes offer. The limitation is structural: a person can only sit in on so many calls, and a new starter can only learn from the calls someone else happened to be part of.
Common Gaps
A few limitations can show up when a brokerage relies on the shadow shift as its main onboarding tool.
The quality of the shadow shift can depend heavily on which senior broker is available. A new starter paired with a broker who talks through their reasoning gets a different experience to one paired with a broker who is simply trying to get through a busy day. Neither approach is wrong, but the inconsistency can mean two new starters in the same cohort come out of onboarding with noticeably different levels of readiness.
Feedback on a new starter's own calls can arrive late, if it arrives at all. Once the shadow period ends, a new starter is often taking calls independently, and a structured process for reviewing how those calls are actually going does not always follow automatically. A manager might catch an issue if a client complains or a colleague happens to overhear something, but that is reactive rather than a deliberate check on how the new starter is performing.
Shadow shifts can also compete with the demands of the senior broker's own workload. When call volume is high or a senior broker is managing their own client commitments, shadowing time can be one of the first things to get compressed. A new starter who was meant to shadow for three days might, for example, end up with one and a half, not because the training plan changed, but because the operational reality of the week did not leave room for more.
None of this reflects poorly on how brokerages currently train new starters. It reflects the limits of a model built around one person's time and one person's availability, applied to a job that depends on hearing a wide range of real client conversations.
Close review early on can fade fast once a new starter is on their own.
Callyx.ai scores every call a new starter takes, for as long as they are taking them, not just the ones a senior broker sat in on.
Book a DemoWhat Good Looks Like
A better onboarding model gives a new starter ongoing visibility into their own calls, not a one-off sample reviewed by a senior broker in their first week. Once every call is recorded and monitored automatically, a new starter's coaching conversations can be based on the calls they are actually taking now, not a memory of the shadow period from months earlier.
The continuous version also has a compliance dimension the shadow shift does not address as naturally. AFSL holders are expected to maintain supervisory arrangements appropriate to their business under the general licensee obligations in the Corporations Act. A shadow shift, by its nature, provides close oversight for a short period and then tapers off once the new starter is handling calls independently. Monitoring calls on an ongoing basis, rather than only during onboarding, can give a brokerage a more consistent record of a new starter's calls over time, as one part of its broader supervision and record-keeping practices.
None of this means the shadow shift disappears entirely. Pairing a new starter with an experienced broker for their first few calls still has value: it builds confidence and gives the new starter someone to ask questions of in real time. What changes is what happens after that initial pairing ends. Instead of the review process stopping, it continues, based on the calls the new starter is actually having.
A better onboarding model gives a new starter ongoing visibility into their own calls, not a one-off sample reviewed in their first week.
- Coverage limited to whatever calls occur during a two or three day shadow window
- Feedback quality depends on which senior broker is rostered on
- Review largely stops once the new starter is handling calls independently
- No structured record of how the new starter's calls are actually going after week one
- Every call a new starter takes is recorded and scored against the same criteria
- Feedback reflects a new starter's actual client conversations, not a manager's summary of someone else's
- Coaching continues for as long as the new starter is on the phones, not just during onboarding
- A running record shows how a new starter's calls are trending week to week
How Callyx.ai Fits
Callyx.ai replaces the manual side of the shadow shift with automated, scored feedback on every call a new starter takes. Rather than a senior broker deciding which calls to sit in on, Callyx.ai records and scores every call against the same criteria the brokerage already uses for experienced staff, so a new starter's first month of calls is reviewed with the same consistency as their twentieth month.
For a new starter, that means feedback is available on the calls they actually had that week, not a general impression from a shadowing period weeks earlier. A coaching conversation can point to a specific call, a specific moment in that call, and a specific criterion the new starter met or missed, rather than relying on a senior broker's memory of a call from onboarding.
For the person managing onboarding, Callyx.ai removes the need to schedule shadowing time around an already full roster. New starters can be brought onto the phones without a senior broker's calendar becoming the bottleneck for how much oversight the brokerage can provide. The senior broker's time is still valuable during a new starter's first calls, and Callyx.ai does not replace that early, hands-on pairing. What it replaces is the assumption that oversight has to stop once that pairing ends.
Because scoring runs automatically against every call rather than a sample selected by a person, the same system that supports new starter onboarding also builds a continuous record that can be used in performance reviews, in compliance monitoring, and in identifying which of the brokerage's more experienced staff are worth modelling new starters on, all from the same underlying call data.
What changes for the people involved
Feedback on real calls
Coaching conversations point to a specific call and a specific moment in it, not a general impression from a shadowing period weeks earlier.
Consistent scoring from day one
A new starter's first month of calls is reviewed against the same criteria as their twentieth, with no separate scorecard needed.
One system, several uses
The same call data that supports onboarding also feeds performance reviews, compliance monitoring, and identifying which experienced staff are worth modelling new starters on.
Practical Steps
Moving away from the shadow shift as the sole onboarding tool can follow a similar sequence.
Once monitoring is turned on, the same recordings can also become a resource for training new staff more broadly, once there is a library of scored calls to draw on.
Keep the initial pairing, shorten the reliance on it.
A day or two shadowing an experienced broker still helps a new starter get comfortable with the phones. Treat it as an introduction rather than the entire training programme.
Turn on call monitoring before the new starter takes their first solo call.
Coverage should start from day one on the phones, not once a manager notices a gap in how someone is performing.
Score new starter calls against the same criteria as everyone else's.
A separate, lighter scorecard for new starters can undersell what they need to hear early. Consistent criteria give a new starter an accurate picture of where they stand against the standard they are working toward.
Schedule coaching conversations around actual calls, not a general check-in.
A coaching session that references a specific call and a specific moment in it lands very differently to a general "how are you settling in" conversation.
Track the new starter's scoring trend, not just a single snapshot.
One low-scoring call in week two means less than a pattern across several weeks. Continuous monitoring makes that trend visible in a way a shadow shift, which only captures a moment in time, cannot.
Summary
The shadow shift is one starting point for bringing new starters up to speed, and pairing a new hire with an experienced broker for their first few calls still has a place. Its limitation was never the idea. It was always the arithmetic: one senior broker's time can only cover so many calls, and a new starter's learning ends up shaped by whichever calls happened to occur during a short shadowing window.
Call monitoring software removes that ceiling. Every call a new starter takes, not just the ones a senior broker sat in on, becomes something a manager can review, score, and coach against. The new starter gets feedback on their own conversations. The brokerage gets a continuous record of how onboarding is actually going, long after the shadowing period ends. Callyx.ai brings that coverage to every call a new starter makes, giving brokerages a training process that scales with the team rather than one that depends on how much time a senior broker has free in any given week.
Frequently Asked Questions
About the Author
Vincent Keogh
Vincent is an operations specialist on the Callyx.ai team, writing for compliance managers and principals on how to get maximum value from recorded calls: across compliance, staff training, and business performance.
Related Articles
Your calls are already being recorded.
Now make them count.
Recorded advice conversations are reviewed against your compliance criteria, with issues flagged and documented. Less reliance on sampling. Fewer blind spots.